翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Webster Township, Polk County, Iowa
・ Webster Township, Rice County, Minnesota
・ Webster Township, Wayne County, Indiana
・ Webster Township, Webster County, Iowa
・ Webster Township, Wilson County, Kansas
・ Webster Township, Wood County, Ohio
・ Webster University
・ Webster University Geneva
・ Webster University Ghana Campus
・ Webster University Orlando
・ Webster University Thailand
・ Webster University Utah
・ Webster University Vienna
・ Webster v. Doe
・ Webster v. New Lenox School District
Webster v. Reproductive Health Services
・ Webster Wagner
・ Webster Wagner House
・ Webster Wells
・ Webster Young
・ Webster's Brewery
・ Webster's Claypit
・ Webster's Corners
・ Webster's Dictionary
・ Webster's Falls
・ Webster's Forest
・ Webster's High School
・ Webster's Home Reference Library
・ Webster's Mill, Framsden
・ Webster's New World Dictionary


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Webster v. Reproductive Health Services : ウィキペディア英語版
Webster v. Reproductive Health Services

''Webster v. Reproductive Health Services'', 492 U.S. 490 (1989), was a United States Supreme Court decision on July 3, 1989 upholding a Missouri law that imposed restrictions on the use of state funds, facilities, and employees in performing, assisting with, or counseling on abortions. The Supreme Court in ''Webster'' allowed for states to legislate in an area that had previously been thought to be forbidden under ''Roe v. Wade''.
==Background==
The state of Missouri passed a law which in its preamble stated that "the life of each human being begins at conception", and "unborn children have protectable interests in life, health, and well-being."
The statute
# required that all Missouri state laws be interpreted to provide unborn children with rights equal to those enjoyed by other persons, subject to limits imposed by the federal constitution, and federal court rulings:
# prohibited government-employed doctors from aborting a fetus they believed to be viable;
# prohibited the use of state employees or facilities to perform or assist abortions, except where the mother's life was in danger; and
# prohibited the use of public funds, employees, or facilities to "encourage or counsel" a woman to have an abortion, except where her life was in danger.
The United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri struck down the above provisions, and prohibited their enforcement. This decision was affirmed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, which ruled that these provisions violated ''Roe v. Wade'' and later Supreme Court decisions. William L. Webster, then Missouri Attorney General, appealed the decision to the Supreme Court. It was argued before the Court on April 26, 1989.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Webster v. Reproductive Health Services」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.